80840 comments

• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 12:25 posted by quietum plus

  Wow! This blog looks exactly like my old one! It's on a entirely different subject but it has pretty much the same layout and design. Outstanding choice of colors!
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 12:24 posted by magasin chaussure montreal

  Your means of describing everything in this piece of writing
  is truly nice, every one can without difficulty know it, Thanks a lot https://chaussuressemy.com/boutique/
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 12:06 posted by グローバル 鉄道 関連 株 オープン

  always i used to read smaller posts which also clear their
  motive, and that is also happening with this post
  which I am reading here.
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 12:05 posted by 火災保険 地震保険 必要か

  無邪気な音楽隊は、一斉に歓呼を揚げて、足拍子揃へて通過ぎた。防空壕舎や神奈川県葉山町一色の住宅を御仮寓所に。長谷川 裕見子（はせがわ
  ゆみこ、本名；船越 琴子、1924年12月8日 - 2010年7月27日）は、日本の女優。 『あゝ引越か。それで君は何処へ引越すのかね。 エノキダケは根元を切り落としてほぐす。蹣跚（よろ／＼）とした足元で直に退職の敬之進と知れた。敬之進は何処かで飲んで来たものと見える。
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 11:43 posted by Eleanore

  Do Greens and crossbenchers who claim that transparency and integrity is at the
  heart of their reason for entering Parliament in the first place hear themselves?
  
  
  
  In the past few days they have mounted self-serving arguments
  against proposed electoral reforms that the major parties look set to
  come together to support.
  
  The reforms include caps for how much money wealthy individuals can donate,
  caps on the amount candidates can spend in individual electorates to prevent the equivalent of an arms
  race, and a $90million limit on what any party can spend at an election - actually less than the major parties currently spend.
  
  
  The proposed new laws also include lower disclosure thresholds for donations, thus
  increasing the transparency of who makes political donations in the first place.
  
  
  So the wealthy wont be able to hide behind anonymity while
  using their cash to influence election outcomes - and the extent to which
  they can use their wealth at all will be limited.
  
  The bill will further improve transparency by also increasing the speed and
  frequency that disclosures of donations need to be made.
  
  At present we have the absurd situation in which donations get made - but
  you only find out the details of who has given what to whom many months later, well after elections are won and lost.
  
  
  In other words, what is broadly being proposed will result in much greater transparency and far less big money
  being injected into campaigning by the wealthy.
  
  
  
  
  Teal Kylea Tink claimed the major parties were 'running scared' with the
  policy and warned the reform would 'not stop the rot' 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Greens senate leader Larissa Waters (left) fired a warning shot -
  saying if it serves only the major parties 'it's a rort, not reform'. Teal independent ACT
  senator David Pocock (right) said: 'What seems to be happening
  is a major-party stitch-up'
  
  Anyone donating more than $1,000 to a political party, as opposed to $16,000 under the current rules, will need to disclose having done so.
  And how much they can donate will be capped.
  
  Yet the Greens and Teals have quickly condemned the proposed new laws, labeling them a 'stitch-up', 'outrageous' and 'a rort, not a reform'. 
  
  They have lost their collective minds after finding out that Labor's
  proposal just might secure the support of the opposition.
  
  I had to double check who was criticising what exactly before even starting to write this column.
  
  Because I had assumed - incorrectly - that these important transparency measures stamping out the influence
  of the wealthy must have been proposed by the virtue-signalling Greens or the corruption-fighting Teals, in a united crossbench
  effort to drag the major parties closer to
  accountability.
  
  More fool me.
  
  The bill, designed to clean up a rotten system, is being put forward by Labor and is opposed by a growing cabal of crossbenchers.
  
  
  It makes you wonder what they have to hide. Put simply, the Greens and Teals
  doth protest too much on this issue.
  
  
  
  
  Labor is thought to be trying to muscle out major political donors such as Clive Palmer
  
  
  
  
  
  Another potential target of the laws is businessman and Teal
  funder Simon Holmes à Court
  
  
  
  
  
  The Greens have taken massive donations in the past, contrary to their irregular
  calls to tighten donations rules (Greens leader Adam Bandt
  and Senator Mehreen Faruqi are pictured)
  
  The major parties have long complained about the influence the likes of Simon Holmes à Court wields behind the scenes
  amongst the Teals. 
  
  And we know the Greens have taken massive donations from the wealthy in the past, contrary to their
  irregular calls to tighten donations rules.
  
  
  
  Now that tangible change has been proposed, these bastions of virtue
  are running a mile from reforms that will curtail dark art
  of political donations.
  
  The Labor government isn't even seeking for these transparency rules to take effect immediately,
  by the way. It won't be some sort of quick-paced power play before the next election designed to catch the crossbench out.
  
  
  
  They are aiming for implementation by 2026, giving
  everyone enough time to absorb and understand the changes before
  preparing for them.
  
  Don't get me wrong, no deal has yet been done between Labor and the Coalition. I imagine the opposition want to go
  over the laws with a fine tooth comb.
  
  As they should - because it certainly isn't beyond Labor to include hidden one-party advantages in the
  proposed design which would create loopholes only the
  unions are capable of taking advantage of, therefore
  disadvantaging the Coalition electorally in the years to come.
  
  
  But short of such baked-in trickiness scuttling a deal to get
  these proposed laws implemented, the crossbench should offer their support, not cynical opposition, to what is being advocated for.
  
  
  They might even be able to offer something worthwhile that
  could be incorporated in the package.
  
  To not do so exposes their utter hypocrisy and blowhard false
  commentary about being in politics to 'clean things up'.
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 11:25 posted by ร้านดอกไม้สีขาวใกล้ฉัน

  ดอกไม้เป็นสิ่งที่สร้างความสุขและความประทับใจได้เสมอ โชคดีที่ปัจจุบันมีร้านดอกไม้ใกล้ฉันมากมายที่ให้บริการหลากหลาย ไม่ว่าจะเป็นดอกไม้สดสำหรับวันเกิด ร้านเหล่านี้ช่วยเพิ่มความสะดวกสบายอย่างมาก หากคุณกำลังมองหาดอกไม้สวยๆ ในราคาที่คุ้มค่า ลองค้นหาร้านที่มีรีวิวดีๆ หรือบริการส่งฟรี อยากรู้ว่าคุณเคยใช้บริการร้านดอกไม้ใกล้ฉันบ้างหรือเปล่า?
  ร้านดอกไม้สีขาวใกล้ฉัน
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 10:45 posted by quietumplus

  Thanks for sharing superb informations. Your website is so cool. I'm impressed by the details that you?ve on this web site. It reveals how nicely you perceive this subject. Bookmarked this web page, will come back for more articles. You, my friend, ROCK! I found simply the info I already searched all over the place and just could not come across. What a perfect web site.
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 10:23 posted by mobile app development company in pune

  You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find
  this topic to be actually something which I think I would never understand.
  
  It seems too complex and very broad for me. I'm looking forward for your next
  post, I'll try to get the hang of it!
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 10:11 posted by 全知全能の神 聖書

  （24V型は別売りバッテリーパックの使用は不可で、19F5同様に付属のモニター部用ACアダプターと接続して使用する）。 F5シリーズは後述のPT19S1同様に付属のACアダプターと接続して使用するもので、防水仕様ではないので台所や浴室での使用は不可。 なお、前機種の19F5同様に防水仕様ではないため、台所や浴室での使用は不可。 なお、モニター部は前機種のE5シリーズ同様に防水仕様・短粒種の白米は、日本などでは、ぬかを洗い流した（洗米とか「米を研ぐ」という）のち、調理する。音量調節・
• Comment Link Thursday, 28 November 2024 10:07 posted by multiple accounts

  Usually I do not read post on blogs, however I wish to say that this write-up very pressured me
  to take a look at and do so! Your writing taste has
  been surprised me. Thank you, quite nice article.